Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
The muddle-through approach
Jul 14th 2008From Economist.com
America’s government tries a quick fix for the intractable problems of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11735141&fsrc=nwl
I am curious to hear people's thoughts on how serious the situation is concerning Freddie and Fannie. What will the companies look like in a year out, do you think that the government should have created the situation coined today as "private profits, socalized lossess"?
Wimbledon Wisdom
-
I recently ran across a graduation speech by the tennis great Roger
Federer. I especially appreciated this passage:
In the 1,526 singles matches I played...
1 day ago
1 comment:
Both should be allowed to fail if necessary. The investors who bought or chose to guarantee these risky mortgages pay the price for taking the risk. If Fannie and Freddie fail, there is a short-run hit felt by everyone -- tighter credit, declining dollar, etc. But in the long run, it's better than forcing taxpayers to bear the downside risk of risky lending. It also sends the right signal to investors: no gov't guaranteee on Fannie/Freddie assets.
Post a Comment